Today's hottest deals

Asus P5B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5B  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090309
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 26 '18 at 04:25
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5430
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 83.7
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 92.1
49% 74 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 178
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gainward(10B0 1184) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Lighting 43.8
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 59.5
36% 48.4 fps
MRender 56.4
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 39.7
39% 49.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600AABB-00PUA0 160GB-$55
124GB free
Firmware: 00.07H00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 66 68 67 67 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 70.2
Mixed 40
SusWrite 67.4
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 39%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 50 55 59 61 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 33.7
Write 47.3
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 57.9
32% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5B Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5B - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback