Acer Aspire 5532

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 5532  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 5532
Memory0.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '16 at 20:40
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon TF-20
Socket S1G1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 23
2-Core 20.3
35% 41.8 Pts
4-Core 22
8-Core 23
3% 22.5 Pts
64-Core 23.1
1% 23.1 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
Acer(1025 028D) 256MB
Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
0.31% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 0.62
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.43 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 0.52
0% 0.41 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.31%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB2OC60F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 70.1
Write 70.9
Mixed 70.1
53% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.22
51% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M4 70T5663EH3-CF7 M4 70T2864QZ3-CE6 3GB
333, 333 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 2.7
10% 3.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback