Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	93.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '18 at 03:46
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 77.8 1-Core 110 2-Core 221 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 439 8-Core 662 68% 550 Pts	64-Core 875 54% 875 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% Sapphire(1DA2 E376) CLim: 1652 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 92.3 Parallax 168 93% 125 fps	MRender 89.8 Gravity 116 Splatting 131 94% 113 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BF256A5 SATA 256GB 673 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: LB1i SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 233 211 215 175 205 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 392 Write 312 Mixed 304 SusWrite 213 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 72.9 4K Mixed 41.5 143% 49.4 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 162 145% 220 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 92%
Intel SSDSC2BF256A5 SATA 256GB 673 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 99GB free Firmware: LB1i SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 263 242 229 229 220 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 397 Write 324 Mixed 318 SusWrite 238 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 76.3 4K Mixed 41.6 145% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 168 157% 244 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 92%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 80GB free Firmware: JKAOA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 60 59 60 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 61 Write 62 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 59.1 40% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: JKAOA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 97 96 97 97 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 101 Write 100 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 96.9 65% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 69%
USB DISK 3.0 8GB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1GB free, PID 1400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 35.7 Write 31 37% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 121% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 23%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 4.4 4.1 4.1 4 4.1 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	5.71% Terrible	Read 23 Write 20.2 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 4.4 18% 14.8 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.71% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH HMA451U6AFR8N-TF HMA851U6AFR6N-UH HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 16GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	MC Read 33.6 MC Write 29.9 MC Mixed 28 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 26.9 80% 28 GB/s	Latency 84.8 47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $697

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)