Asus H110M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-C  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '18 at 18:37
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6402P
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 380
52% 388 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57% Above average
Lighting 71.2
Reflection 73.3
Parallax 62.9
58% 69.1 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 67.3
55% 67 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 64GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN198
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 79 80 79 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
67% Good
Read 350
Write 81.5
Mixed 120
SusWrite 78.6
34% 158 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 34
133% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 84.1
DQ Mixed 69.2
78% 138 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 67%
Great: 67%
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: 1AR10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 145 144 145 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 143
Write 142
Mixed 72
SusWrite 144
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 81%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
25GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 19 19 14 9.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 95
Write 43.2
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 14.3
47% 43 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
41% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.2% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 11.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $166
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback