Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C40D-A (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Larne
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130531
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '18 at 06:53
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Memory 28.1 1-Core 12.5 2-Core 25 15% 21.9 Pts	4-Core 48.7 8-Core 49.9 7% 49.3 Pts	64-Core 48.7 3% 48.7 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FA56) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.66% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 1.69 2% 2.46 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 3 2% 2.42 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.66% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: V2.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 69 74 76 76 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 359 Write 270 Mixed 277 SusWrite 94.4 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 9 42% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 84.5 DQ Mixed 21.1 36% 70.3 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5469-070.A00LF Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 3.6 9% 3.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 3.6 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 266 15% 266 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	1x
240G 240GBBRBench 78%, 141 samples	1x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	3x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	2x
4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 1x2GBMicronBench 17%, 1,163 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16