QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '18 at 16:49
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5620 45 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	48.7% Average	Memory 61.7 1-Core 50 2-Core 104 44% 71.9 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 320 31% 257 Pts	64-Core 309 19% 309 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.7% Poor	Lighting 33.7 Reflection 0.12 Parallax 32.1 28% 22 fps	MRender 34.5 Gravity 36.1 Splatting 33.3 28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 483GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 229GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 51 51 70 84 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 76%
Qemu HARDDISK 258GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 6.1 13 12 27 9.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 100 Write 177 Mixed 182 SusWrite 14.4 90% 118 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 6.6 1,085% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 98%
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 136GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 6.5 12 12 28 9.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	21.3% Poor	Read 59 Write 35.2 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 14.7 31% 41.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x8GB 5,342 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.4% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 14.8 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.4 15% 5.13 GB/s	Latency 123 33% 123 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 145%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	8x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	7x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	5x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	22x
2x16GBQEMUBench 108%, 1,370 samples	12x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16