Asus B85M-G

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-G (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150722
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '16 at 08:39
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3420-$53 4,757 User benchmarks, average bench 54% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Memory 83 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 189 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 192 26% 192 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8534) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3412 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.37% Terrible	Lighting 2.73 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 3.22 2% 3.18 fps	MRender 4.52 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.87 3% 3.18 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.37% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2306RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 3538 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 421 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 19 (A8) Unknown 100 100 168 (A9) Unknown 100 100 326 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 44 (AE) Unknown 100 100 6 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 52 53 227634970672 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 302 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 11717 (F1) Unknown 253 253 3657 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1980 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	78.5% Very good	Read 434 Write 359 Mixed 336 84% 377 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 99.4 4K Mixed 16 121% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 94.2 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 15.2 35% 71 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 99%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 176 5991 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 678 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5824 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 678 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 13 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 152 152 146620 (C2) HDA temperature 116 108 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	64.1% Good	Read 114 Write 109 Mixed 91.9 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.24 97% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 83%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 98GB free Firmware: 03.M0300 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 1041 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 677 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 54 54 33746 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 677 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 44 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 632 (C2) HDA temperature 100 91 50 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61.5% Good	Read 114 Write 99.7 Mixed 78 73% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.38 121% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.A1GC6.CP1 0112 78.A1GC6.CP1 Kingston 9905474-020.A00LF Kingston 9905474-020.A00LF 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.7% Average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	962x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	787x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	533x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	481x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	403x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	370x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	259x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	164x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	153x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	158x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	126x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $317

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16