Toshiba Satellite A135

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite A135  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA IAYAA
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20061208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '16 at 20:37
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron M 430
U1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Memory 27.4
1-Core 11.8
2-Core 15.8
14% 18.3 Pts
4-Core 16
8-Core 16.3
2% 16.1 Pts
64-Core 16.3
1% 16.3 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI RADEON XPRESS 200M
Toshiba(1179 FF04) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.383.1.1000
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.17
Reflection 0.23
0% 0.2 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541680J9SA00 80GB-$76
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SB2OC70P Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 41.8
Write 41.1
Mixed 35
29% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.15
38% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
8.07% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2
7% 2.53 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.1
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 271
15% 271 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.07%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback