Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2618-C1
Memory	20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1024x768x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111219
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '18 at 21:46
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5550 1,356 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 92.8 1-Core 76.9 2-Core 153 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 423 45% 359 Pts	64-Core 716 44% 716 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Sapphire(174B E249) 3GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1320 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.10.2 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.7% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 23.1 Parallax 18.8 16% 20.6 fps	MRender 28.6 Gravity 20 Splatting 26.1 20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 60 57 58 55 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	45% Average	Read 187 Write 61 Mixed 90 SusWrite 57.1 22% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 26.8 101% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 81.2 DQ Write 60.1 DQ Mixed 68.6 52% 70 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 51%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 245 Write 204 Mixed 147 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 61.1 4K Mixed 12.1 63% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 93.5 75% 104 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB 8,287 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 4GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 64 65 65 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 70.5 Write 70 Mixed 44.7 SusWrite 65.7 46% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 43%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 513GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 15 16 17 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	30% Poor	Read 88.2 Write 23.7 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 16.3 27% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 63%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 600GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 3GB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 51 51 54 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 64 Write 57.5 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 51.6 38% 51.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 116%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 6.5 6.9 6.9 5.6 5.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	9.45% Terrible	Read 33 Write 8.2 Mixed 14 SusWrite 7.1 17% 15.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.2 81% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.45% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12x2GB 451 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 12 of 12 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.7% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 9.1 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R670-2 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	14x
Xeon E5540IntelBench 63%, 486 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56801stBench 71%, 2,389 samples	5x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	9x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	9x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x

SSD
Mercury Elec 240GBOWCBench 36%, 15 samples	8x
Logical Volume 478GBLsilogicBench 45%, 9 samples	7x
JAJS600M256C 256GBBench 69%, 1,795 samples	4x

RAM
6x8GBUnknownBench 53%, 2,890 samples	11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	8x
12x8GBUnknownBench 53%, 575 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16