Asus G20CB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G20CB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G20CB
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150828
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 08 '18 at 14:07
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 181
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 352
43% 329 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 4.78
4% 5.74 fps
MRender 6.71
Gravity 4.43
Splatting 11.3
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 32.7
27% 32.7 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 30.6
26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 238 272 259 238 269 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 383
Write 265
Mixed 254
SusWrite 258
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 35.2
143% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 33.6
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 48.5
43% 61.8 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 117 113 116 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 105
Write 117
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 116
72% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 75%
HzW RAID 5 9TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 25 25 22 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.19% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 10.8
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 23.8
24% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
10% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.19%
Great: 74%
Kingston DT 100 G2 8GB
3GB free, PID 1653
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Read 9.7
Write 4
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 11.5
11% 8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 7%
SV FAST 8TB
17GB free, PID 020a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 35 35 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 37.2
Write 31.1
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 36.6
46% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.2
221% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.3% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 21.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G20CB Builds (Compare 971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: Asus G20CB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $312
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback