Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 19 '18 at 06:47
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 135
58% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 222
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84AD) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 16.8
16% 17.4 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 16.6
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 360 386 394 392 393 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 395
Mixed 378
SusWrite 381
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 44.7
155% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 160
128% 175 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 98%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
193GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 141 140 140 140 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 152
Write 130
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 139
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 103%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID 6387
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
2.74% Terrible
Read 9
Write 5.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 5.3
8% 6.02 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.74%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback