Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160316
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '18 at 21:08
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 113 2-Core 195 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 596 61% 493 Pts	64-Core 606 38% 606 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	54% Above average	Lighting 67.6 Reflection 69.6 Parallax 62.2 55% 66.5 fps	MRender 74.2 Gravity 63.3 Splatting 56.3 52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 176 Write 273 Mixed 299 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 93.6 4K Mixed 17.1 113% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 132 132% 215 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 97GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 102 107 104 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 155 Write 155 Mixed 31 SusWrite 105 80% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 107%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 718GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 103 102 103 104 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 119 Write 98.8 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 102 74% 99.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD1 1315 CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR2 16GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.7% Very good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 22.9 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 21.6 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 2,347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	360x
Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	292x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	213x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	305x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	169x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	145x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	116x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	42x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	41x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	45x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	31x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16