Asus P9X79 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 WS  (all builds)
Memory43.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '16 at 15:05
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3960X
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 176
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 567
56% 460 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.200.1035.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Lighting 45.1
Reflection 52.3
Parallax 62.1
37% 53.2 fps
MRender 51.5
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 40.2
36% 44.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 521
Write 413
Mixed 421
100% 452 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 40
147% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 57
66% 115 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 124%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
6TB free
Firmware: AR15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 157
Write 118
Mixed 116
98% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.28
4K Write 3.48
4K Mixed 0.63
188% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 87%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$223
700GB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 110
Write 91
Mixed 93.4
74% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.3
103% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 98%
Maxtor 6V320F0 320GB
97GB free
Firmware: 1900 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 40
Write 49.6
Mixed 46.6
34% 45.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 3.83
4K Mixed 0.46
148% 1.64 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26%
Great: 38%
Seagate ST3300831A 300GB
11GB free
Firmware: .360 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 44.2
Write 42
Mixed 35
30% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 0.84
4K Mixed 0.34
77% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 34%
Maxtor 6Y160M0 164GB-$117
8GB free
Firmware: AY5R Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 42.8
Write 46.2
Mixed 34.4
31% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.31
87% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 32%
Maxtor 6Y120L0 123GB-$132
5GB free
Firmware: AY4R Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 25.1
Mixed 43
25% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.35
86% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2133 CL11 Series Samsung 2133 CL11 Series Adata DDR3 2133 2OZ Adata DDR3 2133 2OZ 2133 CL11 Series Samsung 2133 CL11 Series 48GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.8% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 27
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.9
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 WS Builds (Compare 427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 WS - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $782
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback