Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180501
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '19 at 00:43
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 81.6 1-Core 110 2-Core 218 77% 137 Pts	4-Core 431 8-Core 794 73% 612 Pts	64-Core 1,174 73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36C2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Lighting 47.5 Reflection 44.4 Parallax 39.5 39% 43.8 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 41 Splatting 36.1 31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 567 234 234 231 231 228 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	204% Outstanding	Read 1986 Write 1,169 Mixed 539 SusWrite 287 218% 995 MB/s	4K Read 46.8 4K Write 151 4K Mixed 53.1 219% 83.5 MB/s	DQ Read 977 DQ Write 869 DQ Mixed 744 607% 863 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 236%
Amd-raid SK hynix SC308 S 512GB 172GB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 213 302 229 261 274 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58.6% Above average	Read 270 Write 422 Mixed 255 SusWrite 269 69% 304 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 17.6 72% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 57.3 90% 164 MB/s

Amd-raid MTFDBAK128MAG-1G 128GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 39GB free Firmware: 0005 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 23 31 36 39 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Read 202 Write 31.5 Mixed 67.4 SusWrite 33.4 18% 83.7 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 25 4K Mixed 11.1 55% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 61.3 DQ Write 39.3 DQ Mixed 29.2 28% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 38%
Amd-raid LITEONIT LCT-256 256GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 238GB free Firmware: VRDC SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 196 272 225 256 246 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.1% Good	Read 471 Write 355 Mixed 295 SusWrite 248 76% 342 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 44 4K Mixed 22.1 80% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 112 101% 150 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 68%
Amd-raid WDC WD6400AAKS-6 640GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 30GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 11 48 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 80.5 Write 75.2 Mixed 49.1 SusWrite 27.4 43% 58 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 60%
Amd-raid WDC WD5000AAKX-7 500GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 73GB free Firmware: 19.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 9.1 5 0.6 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Read 64 Write 64 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 4.4 32% 43.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 68%
Amd-raid WDC WD5000BPKT-7 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 91GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 42 53 54 59 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 60.8 Write 68.5 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 53.5 41% 56.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 43.8 MC Write 38.2 MC Mixed 33.8 110% 38.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.3 SC Write 39.8 SC Mixed 29.1 89% 31.1 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,066

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)