Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Packard EasyNote_MT85-M-055TK (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard H15HV
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080620
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 02 '19 at 20:37
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	60%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9400-$55 3,295 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	38.5% Below average	Memory 65.9 1-Core 33.8 2-Core 67.6 37% 55.8 Pts	4-Core 67.7 8-Core 70.6 9% 69.1 Pts	64-Core 67 4% 67 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Generic 00000 SD Card 2GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 3.6 5 5.5 5.6 5.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	3.42% Terrible	Read 6.9 Write 4 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.5 4% 4.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0 62% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.42% Great: 9%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$28 83,084 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 288GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0002BSM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 34 29 28 21 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 39.2 Write 39.4 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 25.4 24% 32.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 5 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.7 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16