Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	95.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181019
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '19 at 20:42
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$265 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	Memory 89.7 1-Core 150 2-Core 300 98% 180 Pts	4-Core 580 8-Core 1,160 103% 870 Pts	64-Core 1,140 71% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.2% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 142 Parallax 112 101% 126 fps	MRender 93 Gravity 119 Splatting 94.9 83% 102 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 182 164 129 137 138 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 453 Write 306 Mixed 274 SusWrite 160 66% 298 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 96.6 4K Mixed 29.2 142% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 202 187% 289 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 168GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 429 442 445 446 447 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 456 Write 453 Mixed 366 SusWrite 438 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 58.4 207% 76.8 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 355 267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 403GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 428 443 445 447 447 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 443 Mixed 420 SusWrite 438 100% 445 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 56.7 203% 76.2 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 352 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Mushkin MR[A/B]4U266GHHF8G 2x8GB 137 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.3% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 11.7 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,212x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,172x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	920x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,030x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	796x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	633x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	501x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	491x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	438x

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,076

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16