PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M (all builds) |
Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131126 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 24 '19 at 14:02 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
72.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.35
|
54.7%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 187 122 175 49 174 MB/s
|
48%
Average
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
158GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 266 298 298 298 298 MB/s
|
63.6%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
561GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 188 219 212 208 208 MB/s
|
55.7%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 16GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 387x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 205x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 131x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 103x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 97x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 87x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $906 |