Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	7.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-670K (2013 D.Ri) 403 User benchmarks, average bench 53% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Memory 75.3 1-Core 60.7 2-Core 110 51% 82.1 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 182 24% 178 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB CLim: 960 MHz, MLim: 960 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.2.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.79% Terrible	Lighting 9.7 Reflection 10.7 Parallax 12.5 8% 11 fps	MRender 8.29 Gravity 9.47 Splatting 9.7 8% 9.15 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.79% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,748 Write 44.5 Mixed 86 131% 626 MB/s	4K Read 192 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 5.7 299% 66.6 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 787GB free Firmware: MS2OA7C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 162 165 161 161 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 159 Mixed 39 SusWrite 163 96% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 12GB 763 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.9% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 8 22% 7.87 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 7 17% 6.03 GB/s	Latency 89.7 45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
FX-670K (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 53%, 403 samples	1x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 12GBMicronBench 41%, 215 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16