Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 3,017 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 79.4 1-Core 88.3 2-Core 200 69% 123 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 350 48% 356 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD P530 (Server Skylake) 5,499 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 103D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4590 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	6.31% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 9.73 Parallax 6.28 6% 7.57 fps	MRender 8.33 Gravity 5.93 Splatting 13.4 8% 9.22 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.31% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB 4,613 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4133101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 127 124 124 132 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 416 Write 256 Mixed 253 SusWrite 129 58% 263 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 57.5 4K Mixed 32.2 108% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 83 74% 113 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 923GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 183 183 182 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 178 Mixed 104 SusWrite 183 121% 165 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391A1G43EB1-CRC 2x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.6% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 22.6 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 23.1 SC Mixed 17.1 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16