Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '19 at 11:56
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Memory 95 1-Core 134 2-Core 224 87% 151 Pts	4-Core 517 8-Core 829 83% 673 Pts	64-Core 1,122 70% 1,122 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 100%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Lighting 45.5 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 43.3 37% 39.9 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 42.8 Splatting 37.6 32% 39.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 33%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) 147,588 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.02% Terrible	Lighting 8.23 Reflection 12 Parallax 8.34 7% 9.51 fps	MRender 12.8 Gravity 7.73 Splatting 16.7 11% 12.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.02% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 139 150 167 168 176 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	73% Very good	Read 323 Write 203 Mixed 249 SusWrite 155 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 89.6 4K Mixed 38.5 136% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 223 157% 200 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 94%
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000H1 256GB 1,925 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 153GB free Firmware: EXT09H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 239 236 231 238 228 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 442 Write 217 Mixed 167 SusWrite 234 59% 265 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 89.2 4K Mixed 24.3 112% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 84.6 117% 218 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 88%
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB 5,922 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 10GB free Firmware: DXM06H6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 479 Write 351 Mixed 293 83% 374 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 99.2 4K Mixed 41.8 154% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 153 155% 254 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 108%
Sandisk SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GB 12,432 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 231GB free Firmware: X4120006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 194 191 190 189 192 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 429 Write 216 Mixed 229 SusWrite 201 60% 269 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 21.6 95% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 186 164% 250 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 92%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 701GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 97 97 98 98 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	56% Above average	Read 98 Write 98.7 Mixed 52 SusWrite 97.1 63% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 57%
ThinkPad Secure HDD 320GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 149GB free, PID 4517 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 42 42 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 40.2 Write 41 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 41.7 51% 37.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36 287,720 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 36.5 MC Mixed 26.4 96% 33.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 37 SC Mixed 29.5 81% 28.4 GB/s	Latency 57 70% 57 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	4,785x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	1,053x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	481x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1,362x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	813x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	399x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	348x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	295x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	282x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	407x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	331x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	266x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16