Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 06 '19 at 18:15
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 261
36% 265 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
MSI(1462 2871) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 31
21% 26.9 fps
MRender 32.3
Gravity 30
Splatting 24.7
23% 29 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 102 44 40 48 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.7% Good
Read 243
Write 238
Mixed 195
SusWrite 75.2
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 36.9
143% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 150
125% 180 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
260GB free
Firmware: 17.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 115 116 116 117 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 119
Write 111
Mixed 72
SusWrite 114
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
327GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 99 99 96 100 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 93
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 96.9
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1333 C8 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $294
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback