Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M EVO (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130503
Uptime	15 Days
Run Date	Apr 09 '19 at 20:01
Run Duration	300 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$189 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 79.7 1-Core 39 2-Core 68 43% 62.2 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 369 32% 270 Pts	64-Core 435 27% 435 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Asus(1043 8377) 1GB CLim: 775 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Lighting 16.4 Reflection 19 Parallax 14.7 13% 16.7 fps	MRender 23.2 Gravity 16.6 Splatting 19 16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 164 Write 219 Mixed 197 44% 193 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 29.6 4K Mixed 21.8 61% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 69.8 DQ Mixed 29 28% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 537GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 127 Write 111 Mixed 81.6 79% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 86%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100 19,960 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 260GB free Firmware: CC34 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 84.2 Write 84.7 Mixed 49 54% 72.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 61%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 290GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 33.5 Write 33.2 Mixed 28.3 24% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 59%
WD Elements 107C 3TB 3,265 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 488GB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 29.9 Write 24.3 Mixed 24.3 33% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 58%
USB Flash Disk 8GB 2,760 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 6GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 19.2 Write 13.8 17% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 52% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 1TB 621 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 268GB free, PID 0b09 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 29.3 Write 23.5 Mixed 22.7 31% 25.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 20%
USB Flash Disk 8GB 2,760 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 6GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 19.5 Write 4 Mixed 5.3 9% 9.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 34% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 127 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 648GB free, PID 0370 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 15 17 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 24.4 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 17.9 31% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 20%
DaneElec Z Mate 16GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 7GB free, PID 0000, ZMATE Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.8 7.9 7.9 8 8 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	5.44% Terrible	Read 18 Write 7.5 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 7.8 12% 10 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.44% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-038.A00G 2x4GB 330 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	44.8% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 9.3 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 81.2 49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $189Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	69x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	38x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	34x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	38x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 20,728 samples	8x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	6x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 3x2GBSamsungBench 33%, 184 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16