PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Huananzhi X79 (all builds) |
Memory | 59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180707 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 28 '19 at 14:26 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
|
45.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Nvidia(10DE 1139) 2GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
20.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX100 120GB-$70
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 166 180 188 188 177 MB/s
|
65.3%
Good
|
|||
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 140 149 155 154 149 MB/s
|
88.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
78.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 124x |
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 71x |
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 67x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 44x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 42x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 39x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $158 |