Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3355 929 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Memory 39.1 1-Core 49 2-Core 94.9 35% 61 Pts	4-Core 93.4 8-Core 94.1 12% 93.8 Pts	64-Core 92.9 6% 92.9 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 31%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 5A85) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.4% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 3.08 Parallax 2.06 2% 2.5 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 5.39 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.4% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GKH84-64GB 64GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0614D SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 56 36 46 44 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 240 Write 67 Mixed 102 SusWrite 42.4 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 10.3 39% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 48.9 DQ Write 42.6 DQ Mixed 56.1 39% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde CL9-9-9 D3-1333 Hynix 4GB 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 4.6 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 207 19% 207 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3355IntelBench 25%, 929 samples	29x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	19x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GeForce RTX 3060NvidiaBench 96%, 8,299 samples	2x

RAM
Se HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung 6GBHynixBench 19%, 3 samples	3x
DDR3 1866 0420 8GBA-DABench 19%, 4 samples	2x
AO2L16BC4R1-BR1S 0793 12GBA-DABench 17%, 2 samples	2x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16