MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	MSI MS-7A33
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33) (all builds)
Memory	21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	8 Days
Run Date	May 08 '19 at 10:02
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 70.8 1-Core 98.8 2-Core 196 68% 122 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 723 67% 559 Pts	64-Core 1,065 66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.7% Average	Lighting 55.5 Reflection 65.3 Parallax 72 45% 64.3 fps	MRender 64.1 Gravity 55.4 Splatting 53.5 47% 57.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35 23,087 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 917 476 461 466 452 451 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	175% Outstanding	Read 1,857 Write 1,959 Mixed 1,649 SusWrite 537 337% 1,501 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 84 4K Mixed 51.7 168% 57.8 MB/s	DQ Read 403 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 385 279% 364 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 175% Great: 284%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 108GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 471 468 475 475 466 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 475 Mixed 459 SusWrite 470 107% 475 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 48.8 158% 53.6 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 360 271% 361 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 133%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 165 167 162 163 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 168 Write 172 Mixed 117 SusWrite 164 210% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.1 211% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 96%
WDC WD75 00AARS-00Y5B1 750GB 393GB free, PID 9561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 95 95 95 95 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.7% Below average	Read 62.2 Write 61.7 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 95.1 93% 66.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 64% 0.9 MB/s

WDC WD50 00BPKT-80PK4T0 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 466GB free, PID 9561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 63 66 66 67 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.3% Below average	Read 114 Write 110 Mixed 71.7 SusWrite 65.7 118% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 42%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 238GB free, PID 9561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 62 65 65 67 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30% Poor	Read 72 Write 66 Mixed 44.5 SusWrite 65 82% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 35%
ST8000VN 0022-2EL112 8TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 3.5TB free, PID 9561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 181 Write 177 Mixed 97.7 SusWrite 0.2 140% 114 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 1.2 223% 6.73 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 4x8GB 247 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.8% Very good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 24.8 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 29 SC Mixed 24.1 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 99.6 40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	102x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	100x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	83x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	76x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	65x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	64x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	28x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	67x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	35x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $415

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16