Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 104 2-Core 198 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 444 50% 395 Pts	64-Core 462 29% 462 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% HP(103C 6886) 2GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.3 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Lighting 16.1 Reflection 16 Parallax 21.7 13% 17.9 fps	MRender 13.3 Gravity 15.8 Splatting 17.7 13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89 9,651 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 106 94 95 95 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 209 Write 111 Mixed 136 SusWrite 94 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 16.5 51% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 67 DQ Mixed 65.6 58% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 48%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 279GB free Firmware: MN6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 106 102 106 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 109 Write 105 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 99.3 70% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 85%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 910GB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 42 41 39 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 75%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 2,523 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 119GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 25 25 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 22.8 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 24.2 33% 25 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 40% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 12GB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 14 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.8 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	29x

SSD
320 Series 120GBIntel $89Bench 40%, 9,651 samples	7x
860 QVO 2TBSamsung $200Bench 98%, 28,979 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x

RAM
8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 Elpida EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 029E CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 Elpida EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 18GBMicronBench 36%, 15 samples	5x
8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 12GBMicronBench 48%, 25 samples	4x
1600 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 4,816 samples	4x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $381

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16