Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S6  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2799
Memory17.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110524
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 05 '19 at 16:27
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5645
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 129
61% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 416
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GS
Sapphire(174B 9600) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.95
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.26% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 0.84
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.22
3% 3.26 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.26%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 527ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 113 108 112 105 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 158
Write 130
Mixed 141
SusWrite 110
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 24.5
79% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 36.8
36% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 73%
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2.90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 106 98 101 101 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
225% Outstanding
Read 683
Write 107
Mixed 122
SusWrite 103
185% 254 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.5
272% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 211%
This bench: 225%
Great: 225%
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 2.90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 45 45 46 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.1% Very good
Read 216
Write 43.7
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 46
64% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
528% 4 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 16.7
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIMERGY TX200 S6 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $347
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback