Toshiba Satellite C55-A

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-A (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	1.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140428
Uptime	19.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '19 at 10:57
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100 14,372 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Memory 83.1 1-Core 55.4 2-Core 105 52% 81 Pts	4-Core 129 8-Core 145 18% 137 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA20) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.64% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 5.31 Parallax 2.78 3% 4.05 fps	MRender 4.76 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.7 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.64% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 95 98 92 90 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 422 Write 122 Mixed 128 SusWrite 95.8 42% 192 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 36.3 4K Mixed 15.8 78% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 70.6 91% 169 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 118%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-08U6AA0 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 79GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 67 66 64 64 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.1% Below average	Read 109 Write 115 Mixed 64.1 SusWrite 65.5 117% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1KBG/4G Micron 4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 6GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	43.2% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 14.3 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 11.6 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55-A Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-A

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	89x
Celeron 1037UIntelBench 43%, 2,458 samples	51x
Pentium 2020MIntelBench 47%, 9,778 samples	41x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	125x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	91x
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	46x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	6x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	16x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	12x
TSB16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 620 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16