Huanan X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardHuanan X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 20:59
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 171
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 668
60% 504 Pts
64-Core 1,071
66% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Nvidia(10DE 1051) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 361.75
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.2% Average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 75.9
51% 66.2 fps
MRender 73.8
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 46.6
46% 57.3 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Viperteq VT-SSDUP500-960 960GB
470GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 263 193 243 213 226 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 432
Write 263
Mixed 313
SusWrite 237
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 36.9
138% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 166
142% 207 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 96%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
235GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 163 162 166 166 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 158
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 164
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
148% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
201GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 130 131 130 132 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 120
Write 107
Mixed 29
SusWrite 130
70% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 107%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 194 193 193 194 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 129
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 193
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
USB 3.0 2TB
263GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 184 179 173 193 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 118
Write 142
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 181
156% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.7
238% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4C 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 32.5
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.5
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Huanan X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback