Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$190 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	49.5% Average	Memory 79.2 1-Core 53.7 2-Core 89.4 49% 74.1 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 146 16% 129 Pts	64-Core 96.5 6% 96.5 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI FirePro (FireGL) Graphics Adapter 96 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 2002) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.96% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 1.58 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.29 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.91 1% 1.38 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.96% Great: 1%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 313 Write 269 Mixed 253 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 48.5 4K Mixed 26.6 96% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 282 212% 285 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 3GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 88.8 Write 84.7 Mixed 54.8 56% 76.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 M378B5273DH0-CH9 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.9% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.8 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	51x
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	21x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	21x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16