Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	94.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '19 at 13:27
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499 6,135 User benchmarks, average bench 87% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	90% Outstanding	Memory 95.9 1-Core 99.6 2-Core 247 82% 147 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 947 82% 699 Pts	64-Core 1,552 96% 1,552 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Gigabyte(1458 3795) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.7% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 136 Parallax 114 99% 124 fps	MRender 96.2 Gravity 121 Splatting 103 87% 107 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 480GB 804 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 370GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.28 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 134 134 133 135 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 194 Write 148 Mixed 144 SusWrite 137 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 14.6 4K Mixed 16.8 55% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 50.1 DQ Mixed 55.8 49% 74 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 41%
Toshiba MK7559GSXP 750GB-$118 5,761 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 8GB free Firmware: GN003J SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 41 43 60 60 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 70 Write 61.5 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 51.9 37% 51 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 56%
TOSHIBA MK3256GSY 320GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 272GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 88 88 89 89 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.2% Poor	Read 36.7 Write 95 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 87.8 97% 65.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 4x8GB 1,118 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	81.7% Excellent	MC Read 34 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 26.7 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 21.7 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 54.2 74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	228x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	103x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	53x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	40x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	39x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	38x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $1,178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16