Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141017
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '16 at 11:22
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 92 2-Core 183 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 307 40% 299 Pts	64-Core 315 20% 315 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.34 1% 1.63 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.48 2% 2.68 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial_CT250MX200SSD1 3TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 253GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 181 180 17440 (03) Spinup time 183 175 5850 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1942 (05) Reallocated sector count 169 169 920 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3853 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1778 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 154 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1787 (C2) HDA temperature 114 98 36 (C4) Reallocation count 1 1 745 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 25 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	6.36% Terrible	Read 71.3 Write 53.5 Mixed 61.9 14% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 1% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.36% Great: 16%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 8 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2516 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1195 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 88 (AE) Unknown 100 100 148 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2578 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 60 48 223339020328 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 21075575193 (F7) Unknown 100 100 658874637 (F8) Unknown 100 100 385461088	58.9% Above average	Read 328 Write 317 Mixed 286 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 15.4 82% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 23.9 DQ Write 85.7 DQ Mixed 14 23% 41.2 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.3% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 17.7 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.3 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	188x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	78x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	21x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
F641GU67F1600G 1x8GBUnknownBench 29%, 191 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $802

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16