Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160509
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 18 '19 at 17:00
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 25.6
2-Core 51.4
33% 46.7 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 446
34% 303 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 84F5) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Lighting 6.83
Reflection 7
Parallax 8.16
6% 7.33 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 7.22
5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 445
Write 433
Mixed 351
91% 410 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 40.4
131% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 138
158% 272 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshib DT01ACA100 1TB
387GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 141 140 138 140 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 154
Write 154
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 139
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
3% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 19%
WD WD10EARS-22Y5B1 1TB
202GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 26 26 27 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 69.3
Write 24.3
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 25.1
28% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 0740 1TB
243GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 63 62 62 61 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
22% Poor
Read 57
Write 57.8
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 59.7
67% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
18% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22%
Great: 41%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
4GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 20 20 24 6.7 6.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 108
Write 24.8
Mixed 28
SusWrite 15.5
45% 44 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.8
153% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 21.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $701
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback