Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '19 at 14:27
Run Duration337 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 145
2-Core 298
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1121
102% 858 Pts
64-Core 1,443
89% 1,443 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.9% Good
Lighting 77.6
Reflection 78.7
Parallax 75.2
63% 77.2 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 74.5
60% 72.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2 PCIE G3X4 NVMe 1TB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1474 967 887 889 907 823 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,771
Write 1,874
Mixed 1,346
SusWrite 991
336% 1,496 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 57.5
184% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 894
DQ Write 625
DQ Mixed 779
576% 766 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 223%
Great: 285%
Ct1000mx 50 1TB
455GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 424 392 389 412 357 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 400
Mixed 416
SusWrite 397
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 48.1
159% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 193
149% 204 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 102%
Great: 115%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 110 112 117 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 105
Write 102
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 113
72% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$78
2TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 106 106 111 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 129
Write 121
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 108
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 86%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$96
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 83 89 94 73 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 98.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 87.9
56% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
105% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 108%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 138 141 140 135 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 134
Write 130
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 137
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78%
Great: 87%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 173 183 187 181 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 141
Write 160
Mixed 102
SusWrite 182
108% 146 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.9
390% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 92%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB
3TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 120 120 116 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 199
Write 137
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 118
169% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 64%
ST330006 51AS 3TB
3TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 119 119 115 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 160
Write 150
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 118
169% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
25GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.1 1.1 0.8 1.1 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 61.2
Write 61.8
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 1.5
55% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 38%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
301GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 1 0.8 0.6 0.5 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 63
Write 72.7
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 1.1
59% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 38%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
57GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 19 19 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 18
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 18.9
29% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.2
70% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.9% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 19.4
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 22.4
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,250
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback