Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 97% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190506
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '19 at 08:41
Run Duration	302 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Memory 81.7 1-Core 111 2-Core 222 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 776 74% 612 Pts	64-Core 1,218 75% 1,218 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6797) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 146 Reflection 191 Parallax 175 119% 171 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 180 Splatting 123 115% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 304GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1215 1048 1012 1009 1014 1000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	240% Outstanding	Read 2,315 Write 2,139 Mixed 1564 SusWrite 1,050 396% 1,767 MB/s	4K Read 45.9 4K Write 72.9 4K Mixed 54 177% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 777 DQ Write 497 DQ Mixed 720 515% 665 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 240% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 336GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 916 509 508 508 509 508 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 334GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 471 475 477 471 471 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 464 Mixed 398 SusWrite 472 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 68 4K Mixed 46 149% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 361 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 710GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 113 113 114 114 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 118 Write 108 Mixed 64.7 SusWrite 113 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 68%
SanDisk Ultra 125GB 1,024 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 20GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 44 47 43 43 44 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 142 Write 58.5 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 42.3 73% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.5 150% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB 2,697 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 43.1 MC Write 36.3 MC Mixed 38.6 112% 39.3 GB/s	SC Read 24.8 SC Write 39.4 SC Mixed 31.8 92% 32 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $852

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)