Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	42.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '19 at 01:34
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 1,239 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 162 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 611 55% 464 Pts	64-Core 1,000 62% 1,000 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 369.39 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Lighting 40.3 Reflection 39.7 Parallax 35.8 33% 38.6 fps	MRender 50.2 Gravity 36.3 Splatting 38.9 34% 41.8 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 512GB 814 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 372GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 87 81 97 62 129 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 363 Write 158 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 92.9 35% 159 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 31.5 106% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 106 90% 132 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 321%
H/W RAID 10 8TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.3 3.2 2.3 3.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	1.37% Terrible	Read 2.5 Write 3 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 3.2 4% 2.88 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 1.37% Great: 85%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 7.5TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 192 196 194 192 191 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 188 Write 188 Mixed 122 SusWrite 193 233% 173 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GR7MFR8N-UH Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB HMA81GR7MFR8N-UH Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB HMA81GR7MFR8N-UH HMA81GR7MFR8N-UH 48GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2400, 2133, 2400, 2133, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	67.1% Good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 24.9 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 16.9 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 83 48% 83 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	418x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	386x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	287x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	106x
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	349x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	209x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $79

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16