Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '19 at 21:01
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$121
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 122
53% 87.2 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 402
39% 319 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 37.3
32% 35.6 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 36.4
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,272
Write 2,566
Mixed 2,613
626% 2,817 MB/s
4K Read 186
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 98.4
463% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 455
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 374
269% 352 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
SSD 240GB
129GB free
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 175 173 271 181 176 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.7% Average
Read 280
Write 99.8
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 206
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 8.8
53% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 104
72% 86.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
215GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 99 99 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 136
Write 138
Mixed 109
SusWrite 98.5
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. F3-12800CL9-4GBXL BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 14.1
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.2
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $353
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback