| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140506 |
| Uptime | 8.7 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 27 '19 at 00:05 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 47% |
PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
35.9%
Below average
|
33% 52.4 Pts
|
18% 141 Pts
|
10% 161 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
10.9%
Very poor
|
10% 11.8 fps
|
13% 16.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
90GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 58 78 76 81 80 MB/s
|
25.2%
Poor
|
28% 127 MB/s
|
38% 12.1 MB/s
|
31% 41.7 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 54 75 73 79 78 MB/s
|
38.7%
Below average
|
45% 61.2 MB/s
|
140% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown F3-2133C11-8GXL000 F3-2133C11-8GXL000 16GB
1760, 1760 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
28.2%
Poor
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
19% 6.5 GB/s
|
25% 159 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 980DE3/U3S3 Builds (Compare 181 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 - $76
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 49x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 30x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 22x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 12x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $210 |