Gateway NV570P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gateway NV570P (all builds)
Motherboard	Gateway EA50_CX
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131008
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '19 at 01:10
Run Duration	411 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3217U 28,188 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Memory 79.4 1-Core 48.2 2-Core 67 45% 64.9 Pts	4-Core 121 8-Core 124 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 0835) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 3.87 Reflection 5.12 Parallax 2.66 3% 3.88 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 2.13 Splatting 7.3 4% 4.69 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30 168,449 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 302GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 38 23 15 26 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 65.7 Write 73.5 Mixed 30 SusWrite 28.8 36% 49.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 61%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 64GB 2,475 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 55GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.1 5.7 5.5 5.4 5.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 35.4 Write 15.9 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 5.7 25% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 2.4 186% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 38%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB 23,482 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 20GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.7 6.3 5.6 5.6 5.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	8.03% Terrible	Read 20 Write 4.5 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 6.1 10% 9.35 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.4 93% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.03% Great: 19%
hp c350b 16GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID f707 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.6 4.3 4.1 4 4.1 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	5.36% Terrible	Read 22.5 Write 5.5 Mixed 8 SusWrite 4.1 11% 10 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.36% Great: 7%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 6GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 7.6 6.9 6.6 6.5 6.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 17.5 Write 0.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 6.2 7% 7.03 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 55GB free, PID 0082 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 7.7 10 10 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	9.85% Terrible	Read 34.5 Write 30.5 Mixed 2 SusWrite 8.6 22% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.1 74% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.85% Great: 32%
SanDisk 32GB 315 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 19GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4 4 3.9 3.9 3.8 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	8.19% Terrible	Read 20.2 Write 13.5 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 4.1 15% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.6 106% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.19% Great: 9%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 32GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 5.6 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 18.2 Mixed 20 SusWrite 5.6 23% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.1 158% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 39%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB 371 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 60GB free, PID 0736 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.9 5.1 7.8 7.5 7.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	6.27% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 7.6 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 6.3 13% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 60% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.27% Great: 19%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 590GB free, PID 0102 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 16 14 14 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 34.5 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 15.7 34% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 45%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB 352 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 53GB free, PID fa05 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 3.8 8.2 5.3 7.8 7.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.93% Terrible	Read 24.7 Write 4 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 6.8 17% 14 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1 58% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 6.93% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB 30,280 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.7% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 15.9 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 10.6 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NV570P Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Gateway NV570P

CPU
Pentium 2117UIntelBench 43%, 5,157 samples	6x
Core i5-3337UIntelBench 47%, 33,616 samples	5x
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	7x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
P3-128 128GBBench 63%, 3,189 samples	1x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	1x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 2,133 samples	4x
ACR16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 671 samples	1x
8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 2x4GBMicronBench 34%, 894 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16