Samsung 300E5K/300E5Q

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 300E5K/300E5Q  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP300E5K-KF3BR
Memory1.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160707
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateSep 19 '19 at 01:27
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 140
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 213
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 6.35
Parallax 6.72
0% 4.37 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 9.91
6% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD128HAFV-000 1TB
758GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 71 77 62 55 53 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 67.5
Write 83.4
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 63.9
45% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF564128CJ8NWMNSEG 0715 TMT425S6CFR6A-PBHJ 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E5K/300E5Q Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5K/300E5Q

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback