Asus H81M-CS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-CS  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 16 '19 at 14:26
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 54.4
1-Core 65
2-Core 87.6
43% 69 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 181
18% 146 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 19.5
18% 19.7 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 3.13
12% 16.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 19%
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4377
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 3.43
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 4.56
3% 4.49 fps
MRender 6.86
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.83
5% 5.68 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,322
Write 2,547
Mixed 2,279
602% 2,716 MB/s
4K Read 127
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 82.7
344% 98.4 MB/s
DQ Read 608
DQ Write 729
DQ Mixed 727
532% 688 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 154 156 157 155 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 146
Write 161
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 156
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2
358% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 110%
WD My Passport 259F 1TB
803GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 112 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46% Average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 112
126% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 1600 0420 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 12.8
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-CS Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-CS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $69
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback