Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20171227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '19 at 17:39
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$130
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 497
67% 500 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 89%
Great: 85%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4860
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.51% Terrible
Lighting 8.17
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 7.91
7% 9.38 fps
MRender 7.14
Gravity 7.03
Splatting 16.9
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.51%
Great: 6%
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E263) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.15
Parallax 9.22
6% 8.46 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 8.09
6% 7.34 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 131 105 105 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 415
Mixed 378
SusWrite 150
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 63.6
225% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Maxtor 6L160M0 137GB
21GB free
Firmware: BANC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 51 52 51 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.2% Poor
Read 45.9
Write 45.7
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 51.4
32% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 29%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
133GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 59.1
Write 49
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 73.7
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 58%
WD WD5000AAKS-65A7B 500GB
200GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 71 70 69 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 79.8
Write 78.5
Mixed 57
SusWrite 69.8
53% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 56%
WD WD10EARS-003BB1 1TB
32GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 47 47 47 47 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 44.4
Write 37.3
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 46.6
32% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 14.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback