Gigabyte GA-X79S-UP5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79S-UP5  (all builds)
Memory35.4 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '19 at 19:30
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$90
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 605
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 752
47% 752 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Gigabyte(1458 3FF6) ≥ 4GB; GV-N207SAORUS-8GC
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 151
Parallax 163
134% 159 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 138
Splatting 110
115% 145 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$35
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 429 434 445 384 393 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 426
Mixed 421
SusWrite 420
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 37.3
131% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 142
111% 155 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 125%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
434GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1815 1106 837 837 839 838 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,368
Write 2,124
Mixed 1,661
SusWrite 1,045
403% 1,800 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 74.2
237% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 50.6
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 490
256% 217 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 237%
Great: 355%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
457GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1115 964 961 966 965 963 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,130
Write 2,046
Mixed 1,396
SusWrite 989
316% 1,390 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 49.6
165% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 415
DQ Write 491
DQ Mixed 466
348% 457 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 177%
Great: 310%
Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB-$136
353GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 90 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 85.5
Write 7.7
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 89.3
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 59%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 5.5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 211 210 210 207 210 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 156
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 208
110% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 115%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD38G16002 PSD38G16002 CL9-9-9 DDR3- PSD38G16002 PSD38G16002 CL9-9-9 DDR3- 40GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.5% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 27.8
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X79S-UP5 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79S-UP5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $686
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback