Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '19 at 20:13
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 76.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 250
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 951
86% 725 Pts
64-Core 1,326
82% 1,326 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
ASRock(1849 5102) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 99.5
Parallax 199
98% 140 fps
MRender 98.2
Gravity 104
Splatting 130
93% 111 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,489
Write 1,194
Mixed 1,193
287% 1,292 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 79.9
261% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 831
DQ Mixed 894
671% 896 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
PNY SSD2SC120G1SA754D117-820 120GB
26GB free
Firmware: N0530A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 157 158 157 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 505
Write 157
Mixed 212
SusWrite 157
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 35
127% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 151
127% 186 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 83%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
534GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.9% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 27
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 15.7
6% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 11.5
37% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 23.9
DQ Mixed 24.4
18% 24.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 99%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
80GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 102 101 99 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 97
Write 80.5
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 100
69% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 76%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
334GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 86 89 88 89 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 88.7
Write 52.7
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 84.8
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 97%
Lacie Rugged Mini USB3 500GB
86GB free
Firmware: 1053
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 28.3
Mixed 22
SusWrite 15.4
18% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,013
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback