PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel H61 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171222 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 29 '19 at 00:03 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | ECU-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
68.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 17 68 14 44 12 MB/s
|
22.2%
Poor
|
|||
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
452GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 75 74 74 74 MB/s
|
48.4%
Average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
306GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 103 99 100 100 MB/s
|
51.1%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-038.A00LF KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
47.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 1,976x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,002x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 989x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 2,016x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,354x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 709x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $87 |