Http://www.abit.com.tw/ FP-IN9 SLI(C55-MCP51)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Http://www.abit.com.tw/ FP-IN9 SLI(C55-MCP51) (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20071217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '19 at 22:49
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49 19,990 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Memory 72.5 1-Core 33.2 2-Core 66.6 39% 57.4 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 130 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 133 8% 133 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gainward(10B0 0801) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.37% Terrible	Lighting 6.47 Reflection 9.46 Parallax 2.06 5% 6 fps	MRender 9.62 Gravity 4.43 Splatting 6.61 6% 6.89 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.37% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 421GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 49 25 51 52 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 60.8 Write 60.8 Mixed 43 SusWrite 42.1 38% 51.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 44%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 250GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 104 101 104 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 102 Write 102 Mixed 63.6 SusWrite 102 68% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 60%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 474GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 9.2 9.3 9.1 9 9.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.5% Terrible	Read 23 Write 14.7 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 9.2 20% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.5% Great: 18%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 640GB 179 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 189GB free, PID 0b09 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9 9.3 9.1 8.9 9.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 23 Write 16.9 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 9.1 21% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 3 10% 3.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.6 13% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FP-IN9 SLI(C55-MCP51) Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Http://www.abit.com.tw/ FP-IN9 SLI(C55-MCP51)

CPU
Core2 6600Intel $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples	2x
Core2 Extreme Q6850IntelBench 47%, 1,078 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	1x
GeForce 6600NvidiaBench 0%, 968 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x

RAM
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	1x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $393

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16