HP 460-p004nl

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 460-p004nl  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81B4
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '19 at 16:51
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 168
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 312
43% 317 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 81B4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 8.38
Parallax 0.09
0% 2.85 fps
MRender 9.57
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 12.9
8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
790GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 148 141 144 127 132 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 189
Write 176
Mixed 37
SusWrite 139
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Hitachi HTS541010A9 1TB
774GB free
Firmware: A560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 107 107 107 106 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 89.3
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 105
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 1315 CT4G4DFS824A.M8FE 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.4% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 22
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 18.7
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback