Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 10% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P7450-$90 2,755 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Memory 36.2 1-Core 14 2-Core 23.4 18% 24.5 Pts	4-Core 38.1 8-Core 29.2 5% 33.7 Pts	64-Core 41.7 3% 41.7 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220M 962 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 202D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.08% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 3.96 Parallax 0.72 2% 2.38 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 3.09 2% 2.66 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.08% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ-AGILITY 64GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.42 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 61 52 40 51 44 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 168 Write 106 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 53.5 73% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 4.2 737% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	8.62% Terrible	MC Read 3 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 2.5 8% 2.9 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 1.1 SC Mixed 1.5 4% 1.53 GB/s	Latency 221 18% 221 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.62% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium T4400Intel $110Bench 34%, 7,903 samples	4x
Pentium T4300IntelBench 34%, 6,462 samples	3x
Core2 Duo T6600IntelBench 35%, 8,673 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 220MNvidiaBench 2%, 962 samples	12x

SSD
Sata III 127GBIntensoBench 72%, 2,962 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x
MX200 250GBCrucial $134Bench 95%, 26,364 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	11x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $110

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16