Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Mcj_unitcom/i7hpr64 B85H3-M4 (all builds)
Motherboard	MouseComputer B85H3-M4
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140102
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '20 at 11:59
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	76%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 115 60% 94.7 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 356 50% 368 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD8730 5 User benchmarks, average bench 7% PowerColor(148C 8730) 1GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.12.2 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	7.38% Terrible	Lighting 8.27 Reflection 11.8 Parallax 11.2 7% 10.5 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 8.1 Splatting 12.4 9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.38% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB 30,264 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 293GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0530B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 177 183 52 8.7 9 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.9% Below average	Read 57 Write 175 Mixed 81 SusWrite 97.1 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 18.1 83% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 40.1 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 42.3 44% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 102%
Sony Storage Media 8GB 319 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 7GB free, PID 05b8 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 8 7.2 7.6 7.2 7.2 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 128 Write 39 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 7.4 43% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 59% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 23%
WDC WD50 00BPVT-00HXZT1 500GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 466GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 25 25 24 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.9% Very poor	Read 30 Write 23.3 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 24 31% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 18.5 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 17.1 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16