Gigabyte GA-H57M-USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H57M-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.5 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '20 at 00:53
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3450 3,425 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 96.1 1-Core 95.6 2-Core 183 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 468 47% 382 Pts	64-Core 472 29% 472 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.2 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.2% Average	Lighting 55.4 Reflection 62.2 Parallax 70.8 45% 62.8 fps	MRender 59.5 Gravity 55.8 Splatting 52.2 45% 55.8 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-128 128GB 1,355 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 216 63 57 56 56 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.6% Average	Read 240 Write 229 Mixed 203 SusWrite 110 44% 195 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 18 79% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 145 122% 178 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 86%
GRAID 500GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 463GB free Firmware: 0000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 113 111 110 113 112 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 159 Write 98.5 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 111 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 1 217% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 77%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.6 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 18 Write 10.1 Mixed 9 SusWrite 3.2 12% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 2.3 160% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	45.7% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 13.3 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 14.1 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 53.7 74% 53.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H57M-USB3 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H57M-USB3

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	13x
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	10x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	8x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	5x
R7 260XAMD $120Bench 20%, 38,521 samples	4x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	21x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	9x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16